Is an unbiased media too much to ask?
To the editor:
On Oct. 8, the Marshall Independent published an article from the Associated Press, written by Josh Boak. However, the title was changed from the original headline, which read: “New analysis suggests national debt could increase under Harris, but it would surge under Trump.” Instead, the Independent opted for: “New analysis suggests national debt Could increase under Harris.” Along with this change, five paragraphs from the original article were omitted.
The result? A misleading title and article. The facts presented in the original report are far more balanced: while Vice President Kamala Harris’ plan could increase the national debt by up to $3.5 trillion, former President Donald Trump’s plan would balloon the debt by $7.5 trillion, and possibly as much as $15.2 trillion. That’s a substantial difference, especially considering the additional $7 trillion Trump added to the debt during his first term–a move that was approved by Congress’ fiscal hawks.
It’s also worth remembering that these plans would need congressional approval, though Trump’s promise of tariffs on imports does not. He continues to falsely claim that exporting countries pay these tariffs, a misconception that his supporters have embraced. His previous tariffs on Chinese goods significantly hurt American farmers, including those exporting soybeans, corn, and pork. Despite this, many seem to forget the damage done when Trump recounts his revisionist history. If Trump is re-elected, and “Retrumplicans” gain control of Congress, his Project 2025 could wreak further havoc on our economy and our nation. Voters must be wise.
But turning back to our local newspaper–was this a deliberate attempt to mislead readers? A form of local censorship? Or perhaps an innocent mistake? Regardless of the motive, we deserve better from our press. At the very least, a correction is warranted.
Tony Doom and Al Kruse
Marshall